Dear Reader:
I hope you are all in
excellent spiritual, mental and physical condition and pray for you
and your family's well-being.
In search of alternatives to
bridge between the worlds of religion and science considered separate
by some, I see it upon myself to share with you any material which
proposes a change of position and rather look at the two from an
integrative lens. Science and spirituality as well as religion need
not be separate systems (with different outputs): the trick is to
search for the truth in my humble opinion.
Previously, a few
scientists were mentioned who are also spiritual and explicitly link
spiritual and religious information to observational and empirical
practice, with logic, diagrams and what not. I mentioned Nikola Tesla
(and his interaction with
Swami
Vivekananda), Nassim Haramein (obvious references from Bible, the
Torah and Ancient religious text), Marko Rodin ( A member of the
Baha'i Faith who seems to be unveiling Vortex Based Math), Randy
Powell, Daniel Nunez (following Marko Rodin and that spiritual path),
Walter Russel (started a whole new school of science and philosophy
and books on certain revelations which Tesla regarded as being a 1000
years ahead of his time!), Viktor Schauberger (started as a forest
warden in jungles of Switzerland ended up with inventions and
drawings that seem out of the time), etc.
Something that can
be considered as good news amidst this seemingly overwhelming
information, is the fact that these people work from a perspective
that everything is connected and that God is ultimately everything
and work based on following His wisdom to achieve altruistic ends.
And it is not then surprising that their work seem to support each
other.
For example you may look at Dan Winter's
website
which contain a massive and rich body of work (of course it might be
just a bias in me, it is up to the individual reading this to
confirm) and gain an alternative and a more wholesome (holistic
perspective) on this universe. These works use science and the word
God multiple times in the same text without refuting each other (and
in fact use each other to support each other). So the material seem
to provide a way to bridge multiple gaps in our understandings and to
full-fill part of that yearning of wanting to know the truth. I am
open to all ideas and attached to none so please bring forth any
criticism.
At this point in time, I think if I know an
epsilon of this material (for example the rich work provided on Dan
Winter's
website), I have
become very wealthy in knowledge. Ofcourse, I pray that people become
more open to these material and revisit them and become more and more
knowledgeable to fill any gaps or any short comings or any low
feelings and disappointments they have from science or religion and
I think these feelings exist in us all.
I shall also warn the reader that I do not 100%
agree with everything I read and keep constantly vigilant so that
this material does not make me fall in to shirk (associating partners
with God). Some think that just because some technology is driven
from religion, their understanding has become so much that they do
not want to associate with other seemingly inferior people and start
worshiping themselves or the person who discovered it or the
technology and what not, this is the most wrong thing one can do with
these material and I pray that we get saved, God Willingly from the
fire that awaits such action. The goal is to understand and make
something useful for God's Sake and God's wisdom and bounty is
infinite and far-reaching.
Here is the link to Dan Winter's
Website:
http://www.goldenmean.info/
I
would also like to add the some scientists along the way who seem to
have not revealed their full story about their experience and path to
invention/discovery. For example, here is an excerpt from a book
called the Tao of Physics in support of this point. I would
appreciate it, once again, if one from amongst you bring forth
information which proves this passage otherwise or brings an
alternative story to it. I also appreciate it if you provide the
authentic source and page number.
From Tao of Physics as cited
on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tao_of_Physics
(and many other sources on the net)
Capra [author of the Tao of Physics] later
discussed his ideas with
Werner
Heisenberg in 1972, as he mentioned in the following interview
excerpt:
I had several discussions with
Heisenberg.
I lived in England
then [circa 1972], and I visited him several times in Munich
and showed him the whole manuscript chapter by chapter. He was very
interested and very open, and he told me something that I think is
not known publicly because he never published it. He said that he was
well aware of these parallels. While he was working on quantum
theory he went to India to lecture and was a guest of Tagore.
He talked a lot with Tagore about
Indian philosophy. Heisenberg told me that these talks had helped him
a lot with his work in physics, because they showed him that all
these new ideas in quantum physics were in fact not all that crazy.
He realized there was, in fact, a whole culture that subscribed to
very similar ideas. Heisenberg said that this was a great help for
him. Niels Bohr
had a similar experience when he went to China. – Fritjof Capra,
interviewed by Renee Weber in the book The Holographic Paradigm
(page 217–218)
Thanks for your time and attention.
Pooyan
