Sunday, February 10, 2013

Biomimicry and Energy Efficiency

There is a site as you know called Biomimicry Institute. On this site, you can search about various subjects....anything that fancies your mind and you probably can find an example of how nature does it. The premise of biomimicy (which I agree with 100%) is that nature is 3.8 billion years ahead of us in R&D and knows what works in this universe and what does not.

Since I like that topic of energy and frictionless levitating objects, I typed energy efficiency and this came up: Learning from Nature How to Create Flow Without Friction. A very beautiful to the point case study about how nature handles energy.

In summary, it says that a lot of energy devices such as fans and rotors that we have are not very good designs. As the result, we have a lot of noise and pollution associated with them. If we build according to nature, which moves water and air according to exponential growth patterns, we find great solutions. Sea shells, trunks of elephants, tails of chameleons, galaxies, cochlea in the ear and pores of the skin all follow this natural pattern containing the golden ratio. The article then refers to Pax Scientific Inc. which has adopted the concepts of nature to apply it to all sort of rotors (rotating devices) in fans, mixers, turbines, etc. Discovered efficiency has been an staggering 10-85% with noise reduction up to 75%.

--------------

Well, the game then comes down to measuring the efficiency of various energetic systems and compare it to the above - now I guess the terms Biomimicry, Abha Coil, Eric Dollard, Tesla, etc. become different, in the sense that though theyare pointing to the same direction and depend on each other greatly, there will be some that are much more efficient.

Obviously, from my previous posts, you might have noticed that Abha coil, Bashar's Space-Time Antenna and other free energy devices are really high up there in terms of efficiency. In fact, when overunity (more energy out than in - because of constructive resonance and energy from vacuum – please correct me if I am wrong) is taken in to account, we are then talking about something like 800% energy efficiency. See this post. Which probably means "biomimicry companies" have a lot of work to do to catchup to these more superior energy devices - Biomimicry should take place in a way that it can reach these supperior goals in terms of energy efficiency. Still thanks for all your hard efforts people out there in the field....if you care a lot about being accurate and more productive, then this is the direction we need to head towards.

Last but not least, just wanted you to enjoy these images:





No comments: